21 Aug
Success has many fathers, failure is an orphan’ has a
wearily familiar ring to it. Last weekend, when the two women to win medals at
Rio—a silver and a bronze—in a contingent of 117 sportspersons were heading
home, India was readying herself to extend them a well-deserved standing
ovation. A 23-year-old gymnast came fourth, a first for a nation in search of
heroes. Various companies and state governments suddenly became open-fisted,
bestowing on the achievers money, land, expensive cars and gifts.
Over the last two weeks, the country watched in
disbelief its champions collapsing one by one. It was left to the awesome
threesome—badminton prodigy P V Sindhu, wrestler Sakshi Malik and gymnast Dipa
Karmakar—to lift the spirits of 1.25 crore Indians. They came from modest
backgrounds and were not beneficiaries of corporate or government generosity.
So, their accomplishments sent a strong message to sports administrators and
officials that celebrity status and endorsements do not ensure medals. Sindhu
is the first Indian woman to win an Olympic silver. Malik delivered India its
first medal of the Rio Games by seizing a bronze in the 58 kg wrestling
category. The daughter of a bus conductor, she was born in a Haryana village.
Karmakar is the maiden Indian female gymnast to compete in the Olympics in 52
years. Not one of the 63 male members of the contingent won a medal, and
barring Abhinav Bindra, none even came close.
The dazzle of celebrations around Sindhu, Malik and
Karmakar hides the state of India’s sports culture and the arrogance of its
establishment. Sportspersons are embraced with enthusiasm only after they win
laurels. Otherwise, their cries for facilities and financial support go
unheeded. India has been participating in the Olympics for 116 years, and has
won a total of 26 medals since then. For many years, its hockey team was
dominant in Olympics, winning 11 medals, including eight golds, in 12 Olympics
between 1928 and 1980. The years from 1928 to 1956 yielded six gold medals
each. Curiously, no sportsperson could do a repeat performance in any
subsequent game, barring hockey.
After Norman Pritchard won two silvers for India at
the 1900 Paris Olympics, it took 52 years for an Indian to win at wrestling, as
Khashaba Dadasaheb did by grabbing a bronze at Helisinki in 1952. For the next
44 years, the country faced a medal drought until tennis player Leander Paes
gained a bronze in 1996 in Atlanta. Four years later, wrestler Karnam
Malleswari became the first Indian woman to win an Olympic medal. Wrestler
Sushil Kumar won a bronze in 2008 and a silver in 2012. In 2016, he was
dubiously conspicuous by his absence. Saina Nehwal, Mary Kom, Gagan Narang,
Rajyavardhan Rathore, Yogeshwer Dutt, Paes, Malleswari, Abhinav Bindra, Vijay
Kumar and Vijender Singh are Olympic medallists who could not deliver a second
time.
There is something rotten in the state of Indian
sports, which prevents our sportspersons from giving their best consistently.
Greats like Michael Phelps, Usain Bolt and Martina Hingis continue to dominate
their game for years, while Indian players are flickering flames that vanish in
a gust of the next year’s wind. One need not look far to discover why. The
apathy of the sports establishment treats our best players as beggars who have
to knock on every door for standard training and facilities. Companies and
PSUs, which employ some of them, avoid sending them abroad for training, or
bringing in world-class coaches. Bindra was one of the lucky few to get an
expensive German coach, Gaby Buhlmann, to finesse his shooting skills because his
parents could afford it. But the gods did not smile upon his father’s effort to
perform 1,000 pujas across 1,000 temples for his son’s success, because once
the ace notched up his first and only individual gold, the game seems to be
over. The gods aren’t smiling on many other sportspersons either, who are
denied even the basics by administrators who themselves travel first class and
stay in superstar hotels. They do not groom sporting talent into career
successes. Instead, Indian sports officialdom has become a cosy club of
luxury-loving Scrooges who are in no mood to retire from the organisations they
have captured.
It is also beset by miserliness. When Bindra said
Britain spends millions of pounds on each Olympic medal, he wasn’t off the
mark. The Indian government’s spend on sportspersons has been declining over
the years while other countries are opening their pockets. According to
reports, India has given priority status to nine games—archery, athletics,
badminton, boxing, hockey, shooting, wrestling, weightlifting and tennis.
Central grants to each have either only increased marginally or have reduced in
most cases. For example, the UK spends over `58 crore on athletics while India
allocated just `8 crore in 2014-15. We spend a little over `5 crore on badminton
as against `19 crore by Britain. India gave `5 crore to hockey while Britain
allocated `30 crore. It is another matter that Hockey India wastes crores on
commercial tournaments at the expense of professional training. Even in Olympic
boxing, a field in which India has some advantage, Britain invested `30 crore
each on its boxers, while India thought the princely sum of `1 crore was enough
to win a medal.
Though all Indian states are now spreading largesse
among Rio medal winners, no long-term strategy has been evolved to spot talent
and train aspiring sports stars. Both the Centre and most states spend 100
times more on advertisements eulogising the achievements of their governments
than on sports. Even in many corporates, the pay grade of middle-level
executives is way above the money spent on training any of the sportspersons
employed by them. Lately, numerous top corporations have discovered the
financial joys of profit-led sports tournaments by bringing international
players at exorbitant fees to play at home.
If India has to establish a basic degree of sports
supremacy, this country of 125 crore people has to spare at least `125 crore
per year—less than the total salary of its top three CEOs—to train 25
sportspersons who can bring home medals in every international competition.
Until then, the fathers of greed, through the collusion between sports bodies
and big business, will keep contributing to the failure of India’s sporting
spirit.